This clearly a landscape image. It is of an upland river that is running
quite full. Although well saturated, the
colours are from a restricted palette and do not contain any vibrant primary
colours. There is harmony through the
choice of similar colours. There is no
clear intention of use when the image is viewed, although it could have been
for publication in a calendar or for the greeting card industry or even
intended for inclusion in an exhibition.
The photographer uses his images to illustrate talks on wildlife and
landscape to a range of groups and this is another possible use of the
photograph. The photographer has
selected the river to be the focus of the image and positioned himself so that
the river runs towards him; he has chosen an elevated position so that he looks
down on the river and can portray the way it meanders down its course in a
series of curves. It would appear that
this is a planned image, although not arranged.
The landscape was static at this moment and allowed the photographer to
carefully choose his position and the timing in order to capture the best light. A small aperture has been used to ensure
sufficient depth of field to keep everything sharply in focus. A low ISO and possible an ND filter have been
selected in order that a relatively long exposure can be used to produce
pleasing motion blur in the water, but not so long that all detail is removed. A tripod has been used to ensure that all
other aspects of the images are sharp.
It is difficult to comment at length on this photographer's style from
this one image. If, however, this
picture is characteristic of the photographer's work, then his preferred style
is carefully planned landscape photography using small apertures to ensure that
everything is sharp from back to front in much the same way that Ansel Adams
and the f64 group aimed to do. Two ways
this photographer's style differs from that of Adams', however, is that this is
colour rather than black and white and Adams like to shoot with short exposures
to stop the water and 'freeze motion in time'.
From this one image it would seem that the photographer's intention was
to portray the river within it's
environment to provide a sense of motion and illustrate the season. The chances are that there is enough
information here to say that this view is as the photographer saw it. It appears natural and the product of one
image rather than a blend of three or more as in an HDR. Some obvious things could have been
'photoshopped' out but have not. This
image does seem to achieve what the photographer set out to do: produce a
landscape image that shows the character of a river in its surroundings. A tripod has been used along with appropriate
camera settings to secure the desired result.
It is a successful image, although a different viewpoint could have been
chosen to avoid some distracting branches in the upper left. There is also a distracting branch caught on
the rocks in the lower right.
What have I learned
I found it surprisingly difficult writing about one of my own photographs. I elected to write it in the third person as someone viewing the image but perhaps it should have been done more personally. It did make me look at it very carefully though and consider aspects that I normally wouldn't spend so much time thinking about such as intent, style and success. I usually decide if I like it enough to keep it. I do like this shot and feel that it is a success but close examination made me notice those distracting features mentioned. I do think it fits what I think of as my style in landscape photography. I dis set out to show 'just the right amount' of motion blur in the water and I think that I have succeeded in this. I also feel that it illustrates the season well.
No comments:
Post a Comment